What You Should Know About the Strait of Hormuz John F. McKeon
- 1 hour ago
- 5 min read
What You Should Know About the Strait of Hormuz
John F. McKeon
The Strait of Hormuz is the most vital artery in the global energy market, serving as the sole maritime passageway for over a fifth of the world’s daily oil consumption. Nestled between Oman and Iran, this narrow choke point connects the petroleum-rich Persian Gulf to the Arabian Sea and the open oceans, making it a permanent focal point of international geopolitics. Even a temporary disruption in its shipping lanes triggers a catastrophic spike in energy prices and destabilizes the global economy as we are currently witnessing. The Strait represents much more than a geographical feature; it is
a critical vulnerability that dictates the foreign policy and security strategies of world powers.
The Strait has maintained its status as a vital strategic artery for centuries, evolving from an ancient maritime trade route into the world's most critical energy chokepoint. The Strait is just 21 miles wide at its narrowest point and 60 miles at its widest. Depth requirements for large vessels limit the shipping lanes to about two miles wide in each direction because the waters are not deep enough for oil tankers.
Historically connecting the Persian Gulf to the Indian Ocean, the Strait of Hormuz facilitated the exchange of spices, silk, and ceramics, and was controlled by competing empires seeking maritime dominance. In 1507 the Portuguese explorer Afonso de Albuquerque seized Hormuz, establishing Portugal as the dominant power controlling trade in the region. In 1622 Anglo-Persian forces, led by the English East India Company and the Persian army under Shah Abbas I, captured Hormuz from the Portuguese, ending their presence. The discovery of oil in the 20th century exponentially increased its importance, transforming it into the primary exit for Middle Eastern crude and liquefied natural gas (LNG) consumption passing through it daily.
Iran and Oman are the countries nearest to the Strait of Hormuz and share territorial rights over the waters. Due to its importance, Iran has threatened to close the Strait of Hormuz several times in recent history. In modern times roughly 20–25% of the world's seaborne oil trade passes through the Strait, predominantly supplying Asian markets like China, India, and Japan. During the Iran-Iraq War, both sides targeted tankers, forcing international naval intervention to secure shipping lanes. Iran has also frequently threatened to close the strait in response to US sanctions, using its geographical
position as leverage in international disputes. Despite the creation of alternative pipelines by Saudi Arabia and the UAE, the strait remains irreplaceable, as most of its cargo volume lacks an alternative exit route.
From the 1960s into the 1970s strategic importance skyrocketed with the rise of Very Large Crude Carriers (VLCCs). The Suez Canal was closed for exactly eight years following the outbreak of the Six-Day War, from June 5, 1967, until June 5, 1975. Egypt blocked the waterway during this period due to the Israeli occupation of the Sinai Peninsula, creating a major, long-term disruption to international shipping and oil trade making Hormuz the primary route for Persian Gulf oil. In 1972 the Strait was effectively "closed" by the combined territorial waters of Iran and Oman, setting the stage for future maritime claims.
During the Iran-Iraq War (1980-1988) in the phase of the war known as the "Tanker War”, both sides attacked each other’s oil tankers to disrupt economies. In conjunction Iran attacked Kuwaiti tankers, expanding the conflict to non-combatant nations, a strategy being implemented currently by Iran on its neighbors. In 1987 through 1988 the US Navy began "Operation Earnest Will" to re-flag and escort Kuwaiti tankers. Later in April of 1988 in "Operation Praying Mantis," the US destroyed several Iranian ships and oil platforms following the mining of the USS Samuel B. Roberts. That July the USS Vincennes shot down Iran Air Flight 655, killing all 290 people on board, highlighting the severe risks in the area. The 1990s disputes between Iran and the United Arab Emirates over control of several small islands within the Strait of Hormuz resulted in further threats to close the Strait. By 1992 however, Iran took control of the islands but tensions remained high in the region throughout the 1990s.
The year 2007 brought more increased naval standoffs and Iran threatened to close the Strait if the US or Israel attacked it. Iran has also habitually threatened to block the strait in retaliation for international sanctions. In 2019 four ships, including two Saudi oil tankers, were sabotaged near the UAE coast. The same year saw attacks in the Gulf, as Iran shot down a US drone, and seized the British-flagged tanker Stena Impero.
In 2023 and 2024 Iran seized multiple ships near the strait, following US seizures of Iranian-related oil. On March 3, 2026, near the strait, the Marshall Islands–flagged Libra Trader reported being struck by a projectile approximately 10 nautical miles off the coast of Fujairah, UAE. It sustained minor damage to its funnel, but no major injuries were reported among the crew. Iran’s past threats of closure has prompted Gulf countries to build pipelines, such as Saudi Arabia's 750 mile line, allowing them to bypass the strait.
Till now the Strait of Hormuz has never actually been closed off. This is mainly due to the fact that Iran’s economy critically depends on the shipment of oil through the strait. What is evident is closure of the strait will cause new tensions between Iran and countries like India and China to rise exponentially. Iran has set mines in and around the shipping channels, and could attack with drones from the air or the coast when vessels try to clear them. The US will likely respond again with even more significant military force to reopen the key waterway. Potential actions include establishing naval escorts for shipping, conducting mine-clearing operations, and targeting Iranian military assets (missiles/drones) The US Navy would likely be used to escort oil tankers through the strait to ensure energy security. US naval forces have deployed minesweepers and
other assets to secure shipping lanes. Saudi Arabia and the UAE are asked to maximize their oil pipeline capacity, which allows some oil to bypass the strait entirely.
As of March 14, 2026, the question of whether "boots on the ground" will be needed remains a subject of intense debate among military experts and high-level officials following the recent closure of the waterway. While President Trump has expressed a strong preference for using air and naval assets they have notably refused to rule out a ground presence to ensure the strait remains open. There is significant speculation regarding a limited ground intervention to seize Kharg Island, which is the "control center" for 90% of Iran's oil exports. Seizing this island could halt Iranian revenue but risks "mission creep" into the mainland. One alternative being floated is the use of partner forces, such as Kurdish groups from Iraq, to provide a ground presence without a large-scale deployment of US infantry. Rather than a full-scale invasion, many analysts believe any "boots on the ground" would likely be limited to Special Forces for surgical strikes or to secure specific coastal perimeters. Whatever happens, fully reopening the strait could be complex and require an even more costly military effort. for the US.
Historian John F. McKeon lives on St. Croix USVI and in Southampton NY. He holds degrees from Trinity College Dublin, (MPhil with Distinction). and St. Joseph's University New York (Summa Cum Laude) B.A. East Asian History with a Philosophy Capstone Minor in Labor, Class and Ethics. John also has certificate from the Oxford University Epigeum Research Integrity Center. He is a currently a member of the Society of Virgin Island Historians.


